State v. Bradley

THIS
OPINION HAS NO PRECEDENTIAL VALUE.  IT SHOULD NOT BE CITED OR RELIED ON AS
PRECEDENT IN ANY PROCEEDING EXCEPT AS PROVIDED BY RULE 268(d)(2), SCACR.

THE STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA

In The Court of Appeals

The State, Respondent,

v.

Nathaniel Noel Bradley, Appellant.

Appeal From Sumter County

 Ralph F. Cothran, Jr., Circuit Court
Judge

Unpublished Opinion No.  2010-UP-494

Submitted November 1, 2010 – Filed
November 8, 2010

AFFIRMED

Senior Appellate Defender Joseph L. Savitz, III, of Columbia, for
Appellant.

Attorney General Henry Dargan McMaster, Chief Deputy Attorney
General John W. McIntosh, Assistant Deputy Attorney General Donald J. Zelenka, and
Assistant Attorney General William Edgar Salter, III, all of Columbia; and
Solicitor Cecil Kelly Jackson, of Sumter, for Respondent.

PER CURIAM:  Nathaniel
Noel Bradley appeals his murder conviction and thirty-year sentence, arguing
the trial court erred in denying his directed verdict motion.  We affirm[1] pursuant to Rule 220(b)(1), SCACR, and the following
authority:  State v. Zeigler, 364 S.C. 94, 103, 610 S.E.2d 859, 863 (Ct.
App. 2005) ("The appellate court may reverse the trial judge's denial of a
motion for a directed verdict only if there is no evidence to support the
judge's ruling."); Id. at 103, 610 S.E.2d at 864 ("Any person who is present at a homicide, aiding and
abetting, is guilty of the homicide as a principal, even though another does
the killing.").

AFFIRMED.

HUFF,
KONDUROS, and LOCKEMY, JJ., concur.

[1] We decide this case without oral argument pursuant to
Rule 215, SCACR.