SCDSS v. Dalquana L.

THIS OPINION HAS NO
PRECEDENTIAL VALUE.  IT SHOULD NOT BE CITED OR RELIED ON AS PRECEDENT IN ANY
PROCEEDING EXCEPT AS PROVIDED BY RULE 268(d)(2), SCACR.

THE STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA

In The Court of Appeals

South Carolina
Department of Social Services, Respondent,

v.

Dalquana L.,
Loresa D., Tommy D., and Penny D., Defendants,

Of whom Dalquana
L. is the Appellant.

In the interest of one minor child.

Appeal From Chesterfield County

 Roger E. Henderson, Family Court Judge

Unpublished Opinion No. 2010-UP-514

Submitted November 1, 2010 – Filed
November 23, 2010   

AFFIRMED

Williams Hubbard and Emma T. Dean, both of Columbia, for Appellant.

Elizabeth Biggerstaff York, of Hartsville, for Respondent.

C. Heath Ruffner, of Cheraw, for Guardian ad Litem.

PER CURIAM: Dalquana L. (Mother) appeals from the
family court's order for permanency planning granting Tommy D. and Penny D. legal
and physical custody of Mother's minor child.  See S.C. Code Ann. § 63-7-1700 (2010).  Upon a thorough review of the
record and the family court's findings of fact and conclusions of law pursuant to Ex Parte Cauthen, 291
S.C. 465, 354 S.E.2d 381 (1987), we find no meritorious issues warrant
briefing.  Accordingly, we affirm the family court's ruling and grant counsel's
petition to be relieved.    

AFFIRMED.[1]

THOMAS, J., KONDUROS, J., and CURETON, A.J., concur.

[1] We decide this case without oral argument pursuant to
Rule 215, SCACR.