CourtListener 10153686•State v. Elayda
Full text
THIS OPINION HAS NO
PRECEDENTIAL VALUE. IT SHOULD NOT BE CITED OR RELIED ON AS PRECEDENT IN ANY
PROCEEDING EXCEPT AS PROVIDED BY RULE 268(d)(2), SCACR.
THE STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA
In The Court of Appeals
The State, Respondent
v.
Michael Elayda, Appellant.
Appeal From Berkeley County
Daniel F. Pieper, Circuit Court Judge
Unpublished Opinion No. 2010-UP-426
Submitted October 1, 2010 Filed October
11, 2010
APPEAL DISMISSED
Senior Appellate Defender Joseph L. Savitz, III, of Columbia, for
Appellant.
Attorney General Henry Dargan McMaster, Chief Deputy Attorney
General John W. McIntosh, Assistant Deputy Attorney General Salley W. Elliott, all
of Columbia; and Solicitor Scarlett Anne Wilson of Charleston, for Respondent.
PER CURIAM: Michael
Elayda appeals his voluntary manslaughter and armed robbery convictions,
arguing the circuit court erred in denying his directed verdict motion on his
murder charge and in charging voluntary manslaughter. After a thorough review of the record and counsel's
brief pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), and State
v. Williams, 305 S.C. 116, 406 S.E.2d 357 (1991), we dismiss the appeal and
grant counsel's motion to be relieved.[1]
APPEAL DISMISSED.
FEW, C.J., HUFF
and GEATHERS, JJ., concur.
[1] We decide this case without oral argument pursuant to
Rule 215, SCACR.
Continue your research in ChatGPT or Claude
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.