State v. Clark

THIS
OPINION HAS NO PRECEDENTIAL VALUE.  IT SHOULD NOT BE CITED OR RELIED ON AS
PRECEDENT IN ANY PROCEEDING EXCEPT AS PROVIDED BY RULE 268(d)(2), SCACR.

THE STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA

In The Court of Appeals

The State, Respondent,

v.

Mandric Lamar Clark, Appellant.

Appeal From Sumter County

 Howard P. King, Circuit Court Judge

Unpublished Opinion No. 2010-UP-445

Submitted October 1, 2010 – Filed October
14, 2010   

APPEAL DISMISSED

Appellate Defender Robert M. Pachak, of Columbia, for Appellant.

Attorney General Henry Dargan McMaster, Chief Deputy Attorney
General John W. McIntosh, and Assistant Deputy Attorney General Salley W.
Elliott, all of Columbia; and Solicitor Cecil Kelly Jackson, of Sumter, for
Respondent.

PER CURIAM: Mandric
Lamar Clark appeals his guilty plea for possession of cocaine base. 
On appeal, Clark alleges the plea did not
meet the mandates of Boykin v. Alabama, 395 U.S. 238 (1969).  After a thorough review of the record and counsel's
brief pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), and State
v. Williams, 305 S.C. 116, 406 S.E.2d 357 (1991), we dismiss[1] Clark's appeal and grant counsel's petition to be relieved.

APPEAL DISMISSED.

FEW, C.J., HUFF and GEATHERS, JJ., concur.

[1] We decide this
case without oral argument pursuant to Rule 215, SCACR.