Lindsey, Roy v. SCDC

THIS OPINION HAS NO
PRECEDENTIAL VALUE.  IT SHOULD NOT BE CITED OR RELIED ON AS PRECEDENT IN ANY
PROCEEDING EXCEPT AS PROVIDED BY RULE 268(d)(2), SCACR.

THE STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA

In The Court of Appeals

Roy Lindsey, Appellant,

v.

South Carolina
Department of Corrections, Respondent.

Appeal From Administrative Law Court

Ralph K. Anderson, III, Administrative Law
Judge

Unpublished Opinion No. 2010-UP-474

Submitted October 1, 2010 – Filed October
28, 2010

AFFIRMED

Roy Lindsey, of Columbia, for Appellant.

Christopher D. Florian, of Columbia, for
Respondent.

PER CURIAM:  Roy Lindsey appeals the Administrative
Law Court's dismissal of his appeal regarding the loss of his good time credits
after a disciplinary conviction.  We affirm[1] pursuant to Rule 220(b)(1), SCACR, and
the following authorities:  Rule 220(c),
SCACR ("The appellate court may affirm any ruling, order, decision or
judgment upon any ground(s) appearing in the Record on Appeal."); Plum
Creek Dev. Co. v. City of Conway,  334 S.C. 30, 34, 512 S.E.2d 106,
109 (1999) ("Res judicata bars subsequent actions by the same
parties when the claims arise out of the same transaction or occurrence that
was the subject of a prior action between those parties.").

AFFIRMED.

FEW, C.J.,
SHORT and WILLIAMS, JJ., concur.

[1] We decide this case without oral argument pursuant to
Rule 215, SCACR.