Morgan v. SCDPPP

THIS OPINION
HAS NO PRECEDENTIAL VALUE. IT SHOULD NOT BE CITED OR RELIED ON AS PRECEDENT IN
ANY PROCEEDING EXCEPT AS PROVIDED BY RULE 268(d)(2), SCACR.

THE STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA

In The Court of Appeals

Allen Morgan, Appellant,

v.

South Carolina Department
of Probation, Parole and Pardon Services, Respondent.

Appeal From Administrative Law Court

Deborah B. Durden, Administrative Law
Judge

Unpublished Opinion No. 2010-UP-312

Submitted June 1, 2010 – June 15, 2010

Affirmed

Tommy Arthur Thomas, of Irmo, for Appellant.

Tommy  Evans, Jr., of Columbia, for Respondent.

PER CURIAM: Allen
Morgan appeals the South Carolina Parole Board's (the Board) denial of his
parole, arguing the Board failed to comply with Cooper v. South Carolina Department of Probation,
Parole and Pardon Services. 377 S.C.
489, 661 S.E.2d 106 (2008).  We affirm[1] pursuant to Rule 220(b)(1), SCACR, and the
following authority: Compton v. S.C.
Dep't of Prob., Parole & Pardon Servs., 385 S.C. 476, 479, 685 S.E.2d 175, 179 (2009) (holding an order
denying parole is sufficient under Cooper if it states the Board
considered the statutory criteria in section 24-21-640 of the South Carolina
Code (2007) and parole form 1212). 

Affirmed.

FEW, C.J., WILLIAMS, J., and CURETON, A.J., concur.

[1] We decide this case without oral argument pursuant to
Rule 215, SCACR.