State v. Sanders

THIS
OPINION HAS NO PRECEDENTIAL VALUE.  IT SHOULD NOT BE CITED OR RELIED ON AS
PRECEDENT IN ANY PROCEEDING EXCEPT AS PROVIDED BY RULE 268(d)(2), SCACR.

THE STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA

In The Court of Appeals

The State, Respondent,

v.

Matthew
Sanders, Appellant.

Appeal From Aiken County

J. Michelle Childs, Circuit Court Judge

Unpublished Opinion No. 2010-UP-236

Submitted March 1, 2010 – Filed April 12,
2010   

APPEAL DISMISSED

Appellate Defender Elizabeth A. Franklin-Best,
of Columbia, for Appellant.

Teresa A. Knox, of Columbia, for
Respondent.

PER CURIAM:  Matthew
Sanders appeals his probation revocation, arguing the probation court erred by
revoking his probation without finding the violations willful.  After a thorough review of the record and counsel's
brief pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), and State
v. Williams, 305 S.C. 116, 406 S.E.2d 357 (1991), we dismiss[1] the appeal and grant counsel's motion to be relieved.

APPEAL
DISMISSED.

SHORT, WILLIAMS, and
LOCKEMY, JJ., concur.

[1] We decide this case without oral argument pursuant to
Rule 215, SCACR.