CourtListener 10153384•State v. Christopher Bennett
Full text
THIS OPINION
HAS NO PRECEDENTIAL VALUE. IT SHOULD NOT BE CITED OR RELIED ON AS PRECEDENT IN
ANY PROCEEDING EXCEPT AS PROVIDED BY RULE 268(d)(2), SCACR.
THE STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA
In The Court of Appeals
The State, Respondent,
v.
Christopher
Bennett, Appellant.
Appeal From Spartanburg County
J. Derham Cole, Circuit Court Judge
Unpublished Opinion No. 2010-UP-068
Submitted January 4, 2010 Filed February
1, 2010
APPEAL DISMISSED
Senior Appellate Defender Joseph L.
Savitz, III, of Columbia, for Appellant.
Attorney General Henry Dargan McMaster, Chief
Deputy Attorney General John W. McIntosh, and Assistant Deputy Attorney General
Donald J. Zelenka, all of Columbia; Solicitor Harold W. Gowdy, III, of
Spartanburg, for Respondent.
PER CURIAM: Christopher
E. Bennett appeals his convictions and sentences for murder, assault with
intent to kill, and two counts of armed robbery. On appeal, Bennett argues the
trial court erred in failing to sever the charges. After a thorough review of the record and counsel's
brief pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), and State
v. Williams, 305 S.C. 116, 406 S.E.2d 357 (1991), we dismiss the appeal and
grant counsel's petition to be relieved.[1]
APPEAL DISMISSED.
SHORT, THOMAS, and
KONDUROS, JJ., concur.
[1] We decide this case without oral argument pursuant to
Rule 215, SCACR.
Continue your research in ChatGPT or Claude
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.