State v. Henry Baker

CourtListener 10153374ScctappFeb 2, 2010

Full text

THIS OPINION
HAS NO PRECEDENTIAL VALUE.  IT SHOULD NOT BE CITED OR RELIED ON AS
PRECEDENT IN ANY PROCEEDING EXCEPT AS PROVIDED BY RULE 268(d)(2), SCACR.

THE STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA

In The Court of Appeals

The State, Respondent,

v.

Henry Amos
Baker, Appellant.

Appeal From York County

Kristi Lee Harrington, Circuit Court Judge

Unpublished Opinion No. 2010-UP-082

Submitted January 4, 2010 – Filed February
2, 2010   

APPEAL DISMISSED

Appellate Defender Kathrine H. Hudgins, of
Columbia, for Appellant.

J. Benjamin Aplin, of Columbia, for
Respondent.

PER CURIAM: Henry
Amos Baker appeals the revocation of his probation. Baker contends the trial
court erred by revoking his probation on the grounds that he failed to pay
fines or restitution.  After
a thorough review of the record, and counsel's brief,  pursuant to Anders v.
California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967) and State v. Williams, 305 S.C. 116,
406 S.E.2d 357 (1991), we dismiss the appeal and grant counsel's motion to be
relieved.[1]

APPEAL
DISMISSED.

SHORT, THOMAS,
and KONDUROS, JJ., concur.

[1] We decide this case without oral argument
pursuant to Rule 215, SCACR.

Continue your research in ChatGPT or Claude

Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.