SC Dept of Labor, Licensing, and Regulations v. Michael Paulin

CourtListener 10153366ScctappFeb 3, 2010

Full text

THIS
OPINION HAS NO PRECEDENTIAL VALUE.  IT SHOULD NOT BE CITED OR RELIED ON AS
PRECEDENT IN ANY PROCEEDING EXCEPT AS PROVIDED BY RULE 268(d)(2), SCACR.

THE STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA

In The Court of Appeals

South Carolina
Department of Labor, Licensing, and Regulation, Respondent,

v.

Michael A.
Paulin, Appellant.

Appeal From Administrative Law Court

John D. Geathers, Administrative Law
Judge

Unpublished Opinion No. 2010-UP-091

Submitted February 1, 2010 – Filed
February 3, 2010   

AFFIRMED

Michael A. Paulin, pro se, for Appellant.

Sheridon Hunter Spoon, of Columbia, for
Respondent.

PER CURIAM:  Michael A. Paulin appeals the
Administrative Law Court's order affirming the State Board of Accountancy's
order revoking his certified public accountant's license.  He argues the Board
lacked subject matter jurisdiction.  We affirm[1] pursuant to Rule 220(b), SCACR, and the following
authority:  S.C. Code Ann. § 40-1-115 (2001) ("A board has jurisdiction
over the actions committed or omitted by current and former licensees during
the entire period of licensure. The board has jurisdiction to act on any matter
which arises during the practice authorization period.").

AFFIRMED.

HUFF, THOMAS, and
KONDUROS, JJ., concur.

[1] We decide this case without oral argument pursuant to
Rule 215, SCACR.

Continue your research in ChatGPT or Claude

Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.