State v. William McHaney

THIS OPINION
HAS NO PRECEDENTIAL VALUE.  IT SHOULD NOT BE CITED OR RELIED ON AS
PRECEDENT IN ANY PROCEEDING EXCEPT AS PROVIDED BY RULE 268(d)(2), SCACR.

THE STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA

In The Court of Appeals

The State, Respondent,

v.

William McHaney, Appellant.

Appeal From Abbeville County

Thomas L. Hughston, Jr., Circuit Court
Judge

Unpublished Opinion No. 2010-UP-084

Submitted January 4, 2010 – Filed February
3, 2010   

APPEAL DISMISSED

Deputy Chief Appellate Defender Wanda H.
Carter, of Columbia, for Appellant.

Attorney General Henry Dargan McMaster, Chief
Deputy Attorney General John W. McIntosh, Assistant Deputy Attorney General Salley
W. Elliott, of Columbia, and Solicitor Jerry W. Peace, of Greenwood, for
Respondent.

PER CURIAM:  William McHaney appeals his sentence of
one year imprisonment, suspended upon the service of one year probation,
arguing the trial judge erred in sentencing him in violation of the state
constitutional mandate which provides for one's rehabilitation subsequent to
receipt of a criminal conviction.  After a thorough review of the record, and counsel's
brief,  pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967) and State
v. Williams, 305 S.C. 116, 406 S.E.2d 357 (1991), we dismiss the appeal and
grant counsel's motion to be relieved.[1]

APPEAL
DISMISSED.

SHORT, THOMAS,
and KONDUROS, JJ., concur.

[1] We decide this case without oral argument pursuant
to Rule 215, SCACR.