State v. Elizabeth Tillman

THIS
OPINION HAS NO PRECEDENTIAL VALUE.  IT SHOULD NOT BE CITED OR RELIED ON AS
PRECEDENT IN ANY PROCEEDING EXCEPT AS PROVIDED BY RULE 268(d)(2), SCACR.

THE STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA

In The Court of Appeals

The State, Respondent,

v.

Elizabeth
Tillman, Appellant.

Appeal from Lexington County

Kenneth G. Goode, Circuit Court Judge

Unpublished Opinion No. 2010-UP-110

Submitted January 4, 2010 – Filed February
8, 2010   

APPEAL DISMISSED

Appellate Defender Katherine H. Hudgins,
of Columbia, for Appellant.

Attorney General Henry Dargan McMaster,
Chief Deputy Attorney General John W. McIntosh, Assistant Deputy Attorney
General Salley W. Elliott, all of Columbia, and Solicitor Donald V. Myers, of
Lexington, for Respondent.

PER CURIAM:  Elizabeth Tillman appeals her guilty
plea arguing it was rendered involuntary because the trial judge failed to
advise that the sentences for each charge could be imposed consecutively.  After
a thorough review of the record and counsel’s brief pursuant to Anders v.
California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), and State v. Williams, 305 S.C.
116, 406 S.E.2d 357 (1991), we dismiss the appeal and grant counsel’s motion to
be relieved.[1]

APPEAL
DISMISSED.

WILLIAMS,
PIEPER, and LOCKEMY, JJ., concur.

[1] We decide this case without oral argument pursuant to
Rule 215, SCACR.