CourtListener 10153322•State v. Demareo Mack
Full text
THIS OPINION HAS NO PRECEDENTIAL
VALUE. IT SHOULD NOT BE CITED OR RELIED ON AS PRECEDENT IN ANY PROCEEDING
EXCEPT AS PROVIDED BY RULE 268(d)(2), SCACR.
THE STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA
In The Court of Appeals
The State, Respondent,
v.
Demareo Vadale Mack, Appellant.
Appeal From Spartanburg County
Paul M. Burch, Circuit Court Judge
Unpublished Opinion No. 2010-UP-134
Submitted January 4, 2010 Filed February
17, 2010
APPEAL DISMISSED
Chief Appellate Defender Robert M. Dudek,
of Columbia, for Appellant.
Attorney General Henry Dargan McMaster, Chief
Deputy Attorney General John W. McIntosh, Assistant Deputy Attorney General
Donald J. Zelenka, Office of the Attorney General, all of Columbia; Solicitor Harold
W. Gowdy, III, of Spartanburg, for Respondent.
PER CURIAM: Demareo Vadale Mack appeals his guilty
plea to first-degree lynching. On appeal, Mack alleges the plea did not meet the mandates of Boykin v.
Alabama, 395 U.S. 238 (1969). After
a thorough review of the record and counsel's brief pursuant to Anders v.
California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967) and State v. Williams, 305 S.C. 116,
406 S.E.2d 357 (1991), we dismiss Mack's appeal and grant counsel's motion to
be relieved.[1]
APPEAL
DISMISSED.
WILLIAMS,
PIEPER, and LOCKEMY, JJ., concur.
[1] We decide this case without oral argument pursuant to
Rule 215, SCACR.
Continue your research in ChatGPT or Claude
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.