State v. Ramon McCullough

THIS
OPINION HAS NO PRECEDENTIAL VALUE.  IT SHOULD NOT BE CITED OR RELIED ON AS
PRECEDENT IN ANY PROCEEDING EXCEPT AS PROVIDED BY RULE 268(d)(2), SCACR.

THE STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA

In The Court of Appeals

The State, Respondent,

v.

Ramon M.
McCullough, Appellant.

Appeal From York County

John C. Hayes, III, Circuit Court Judge

Unpublished Opinion No.  2010-UP-135

Submitted January 4, 2010 – Filed February
17, 2010

APPEAL DISMISSED

Chief Appellate Defender Joseph L. Savitz,
III, of Columbia, for Appellant.

John Benjamin Aplin, of Columbia, for
Respondent.

PER CURIAM:  Ramon McCullough appeals the revocation
of his probation.  On appeal, McCullough argues his probation revocation hearing was so summary that the record is
insufficient for review and, therefore, the revocation should be reversed. 
After a thorough review of the record and counsel's brief pursuant to Anders v. California,
386 U.S. 738 (1967) and State v. Williams, 305 S.C. 116, 406 S.E.2d 357
(1991), we dismiss McCullough's appeal and grant counsel's motion to be
relieved.[1]

APPEAL
DISMISSED.

WILLIAMS, PIEPER,
and LOCKEMY, JJ., concur.

[1] We decide this case without oral argument pursuant to
Rule 215, SCACR.