State v. Dontavious Mack

THIS OPINION HAS NO
PRECEDENTIAL VALUE.  IT SHOULD NOT BE CITED OR RELIED ON AS PRECEDENT IN ANY
PROCEEDING EXCEPT AS PROVIDED BY RULE 268(d) (2), SCACR.

THE STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA

In The Court of Appeals

The State, Respondent,

v.

Dontavious
Ricardo Mack, Appellant.

Appeal From York County

Lee S. Alford, Circuit Court Judge

Unpublished Opinion No. 2010-UP-008

Submitted January 4, 2010 – Filed January
21, 2010   

APPEAL DISMISSED

Senior Appellate Attorney for south
Carolina Commission of Indigent Defense, Division of Appellate Defense, Robert
M. Dudek, South Carolina Commission, of Columbia, for Appellant.

Attorney General Henry Dargan McMaster, Chief
Deputy Attorney General John W. McIntosh, Assistant Deputy Attorney General
Donald J. Zelenka, Office of the Attorney General, of Columbia, Kevin Scott
Brackett, 16th Circuit Solicitor's Office, of York, for Respondent.

PER CURIAM:  Dontavious Ricardo Mack pled guilty to
one count of murder, one count of armed robbery, one count of possession of a
firearm during the commission of a violent crime, one count of kidnapping, one
count of criminal conspiracy, one count of possession of a pistol by a person
under the age of twenty-one, and one count of possession of a stolen vehicle.  Mack
appeals his concurrent sentences of thirty years for armed robbery, twenty
years for kidnapping, five years for criminal conspiracy, five years for
possession of a pistol during a violent crime, one year for possession of a
pistol by a person under the age of twenty-one, five years for possession of a
stolen vehicle valued over five thousand dollars, and life without parole for
murder.  Mack's counsel attached to the brief a petition to be relieved as
counsel, stating that he had reviewed the record and concluded this appeal
lacks merit.  Mack did not file a pro se brief.  After a thorough
review of the record and counsel's brief pursuant to Anders v. California,
386 U.S. 738 (1967) and State v. Williams, 305 S.C. 116, 406 S.E.2d 357
(1991), we dismiss[1] the appeal and grant counsel's petition to be relieved.

APPEAL
DISMISSED

HUFF, A.C.J.,
GEATHERS, J., and CURETON, A.J., concur.

[1] We decide this
case without oral argument pursuant to Rule 215, SCACR.