CourtListener 10153278•State v. Gary Piper
Full text
THIS OPINION HAS NO
PRECEDENTIAL VALUE. IT SHOULD NOT BE CITED OR RELIED ON AS PRECEDENT IN ANY
PROCEEDING EXCEPT AS PROVIDED BY RULE 268(d)(2), SCACR.
THE STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA
In The Court of Appeals
The State, Respondent,
v.
Gary M. Piper, Appellant.
Appeal From Spartanburg County
Thomas W. Cooper, Jr., Circuit Court Judge
Unpublished Opinion No. 2010-UP-013
Submitted January 4, 2010 Filed January 21, 2010
APPEAL DISMISSED
Appellate Defender Robert M. Pachak, of Columbia,
for Appellant.
Attorney General Henry Dargan McMaster, Chief
Deputy Attorney General John W. McIntosh, Assistant Deputy Attorney General Salley
W. Elliott, all of Columbia; and Harold W. Gowdy, III, of Spartanburg, for
Respondent.
PER
CURIAM: Appellant, Gary M. Piper,
was indicted for murder, pointing and presenting a firearm, failure to stop a
motor vehicle when signaled by an officer, and two counts of attempted armed
robbery. During a jury trial on the charges, Piper pled guilty to the failure
to stop charge and was thereafter convicted of the remaining charges. The
trial court sentenced Piper to concurrent sentences of forty-five years for
murder, five years for pointing and presenting a firearm, five years for
failure to stop, and twenty years on each of the armed robbery charges. Pipers counsel attached to the brief a
petition to be relieved as counsel, stating that he had reviewed the record and
concluded this appeal lacks merit. Piper did not file a separate pro se brief. After a thorough review of the record pursuant to Anders v.
California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967) and State v. Williams, 305 S.C. 116,
406 S.E.2d 357 (1991), we dismiss[1] the appeal and grant counsels petition to be relieved.
APPEAL DISMISSED.
HUFF, A.C.J., GEATHERS,
J., and CURETON, A.J., concur.
[1] We decide this case without oral argument pursuant to
Rule 215, SCACR.
Continue your research in ChatGPT or Claude
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.