State v. Travis Bigger

CourtListener 10153256ScctappJan 25, 2010

Full text

THIS OPINION
HAS NO PRECEDENTIAL VALUE.  IT SHOULD NOT BE CITED OR RELIED ON AS PRECEDENT IN
ANY PROCEEDING EXCEPT AS PROVIDED BY RULE 268(d)(2), SCACR.

THE STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA

In The Court of Appeals

The State, Respondent,

v.

Travis J.
Bigger, Appellant.

Appeal from York County

Roger L. Couch, Special Circuit Court
Judge

Unpublished Opinion No. 2010-UP-030

Submitted January 4, 2010 – Filed January
25, 2010 

APPEAL DISMISSED

Appellant Defender Kathrine H. Hudgins, South
Carolina Commission on Indigent Defense, of Columbia, for Appellant.

Assistant Chief Legal Counsel J. Benjamin
Aplin, South Carolina Department of Probation, Parole and Pardon Services, of
Columbia, for Respondent.

PER CURIAM:  Travis J. Bigger appeals his community
supervision revocation, arguing that insufficient evidence was presented to
show that he violated a condition of his community supervision program.  After
thoroughly reviewing the record and counsel's brief pursuant to Anders v.
California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), and State v. Williams, 305 S.C.
116, 406 S.E.2d 357 (1991), we dismiss Bigger's appeal and grant counsel's
petition to be relieved.[1]  

APPEAL
DISMISSED.

HUFF, A.C.J.,
GEATHERS, J. and CURETON, A.J., concur.

[1] We decide this case without oral argument pursuant to
Rule 215, SCACR.

Continue your research in ChatGPT or Claude

Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.