CourtListener 10153242•State v. Thomas Small
Full text
THIS
OPINION HAS NO PRECEDENTIAL VALUE. IT SHOULD NOT BE CITED OR RELIED ON AS
PRECEDENT IN ANY PROCEEDING EXCEPT AS PROVIDED BY RULE 268(d)(2), SCACR.
THE STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA
In The Court of Appeals
The State, Respondent,
v.
Thomas Lee
Small, Appellant.
Appeal From York County
John C. Hayes, III, Circuit Court Judge
Unpublished Opinion No. 2010-UP-038
Submitted January 4, 2010 Filed January
26, 2010
APPEAL DISMISSED
Appellate Defender Robert M. Pachak, of
Columbia, for Appellant.
Attorney General Henry Dargan McMaster, Chief
Deputy Attorney General John W. McIntosh, Assistant Deputy Attorney General
Salley W. Elliott, all of Columbia; and Kevin Scott Brackett, of York, for
Respondent.
PER CURIAM: Thomas
Lee Small appeals his conviction for possession of crack cocaine. He argues
the trial court erred in failing to direct a verdict. After a thorough review of the record and counsel's
brief pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967) and State
v. Williams, 305 S.C. 116, 406 S.E.2d 357 (1991), we dismiss[1] the appeal and grant counsel's motion to be relieved.
APPEAL
DISMISSED.
HUFF, A.C.J., GEATHERS,
J., and CURETON, A.J., concur.
[1] We decide this case without oral argument pursuant to
Rule 215, SCACR.
Continue your research in ChatGPT or Claude
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.