State v. Kimberlee Huffstetler

THIS OPINION
HAS NO PRECEDENTIAL VALUE. IT SHOULD NOT BE CITED OR RELIED ON AS PRECEDENT IN
ANY PROCEEDING EXCEPT AS PROVIDED BY RULE 268(d)(2), SCACR.

THE STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA

In The Court of Appeals

The State, Respondent,

v.

Kimberlee U. Huffstetler, Appellant.

Appeal From York County

Roger L. Couch, Circuit Court Judge

Unpublished Opinion No. 2010-UP-061  

Submitted January 4, 2010 – Filed January
28, 2010

Affirmed

Appellate Defender Elizabeth A.
Franklin-Best, of Columbia, for Appellant.

J. Benjamin Aplin, of Columbia, for
Respondent.

PER CURIAM: Kimberlee
Huffstetler appeals her probation revocation.  We affirm[1] pursuant to Rule 220(b)(1), SCACR, and the following authority:  State v. Hamilton, 333 S.C. 642, 648, 511 S.E.2d 94, 96-97 (Ct. App. 1999) (holding that
a challenge to the validity of a probation revocation must be raised to and
ruled upon by the revocation judge to be preserved for our review).

Affirmed.

SHORT, THOMAS, and
KONDUROS, JJ., concur.

[1] We decide this case without oral argument pursuant to
Rule 215, SCACR.