State v. Teamer

CourtListener 10153221ScctappJan 28, 2010

Full text

THIS OPINION
HAS NO PRECEDENTIAL VALUE.  IT SHOULD NOT BE CITED OR RELIED ON AS
PRECEDENT IN ANY PROCEEDING EXCEPT AS PROVIDED BY RULE 268(d)(2), SCACR.

THE STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA

In The Court of Appeals

The State, Respondent,

v.

Nathaniel
Teamer, Appellant.

Appeal From Spartanburg County

 J. Derham Cole, Circuit Court Judge

Unpublished Opinion No. 2010-UP-062

Submitted January 4, 2010 – Filed January
28, 2010

Withdrawn, Substituted and Refiled April
21, 2010

APPEAL DISMISSED

Acting Chief Appellate Defender Robert M. Dudek, of Columbia, for
Appellant.

Attorney General Henry Dargan McMaster, Chief Deputy Attorney
General John W. McIntosh, and

Assistant Deputy Attorney General Donald J. Zelenka, all of
Columbia; Solicitor Harold W. Gowdy, III, of Spartanburg, for Respondent.

PER CURIAM: Nathaniel Teamer appeals his consecutive sentences of
life imprisonment and twenty years for murder and assault and battery with
intent to kill, respectively.  Teamer contends the trial court erred by
admitting a videotape into evidence.  After a thorough review of the record, counsel's brief, and Teamer's pro se brief, pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S.
738 (1967) and State v. Williams, 305 S.C. 116, 406 S.E.2d 357 (1991),
we dismiss the appeal and grant counsel's motion to be relieved.[1]

APPEAL
DISMISSED.

SHORT,
THOMAS, and KONDUROS, JJ., concur.

[1] We decide this case without oral argument
pursuant to Rule 215, SCACR.

Continue your research in ChatGPT or Claude

Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.