SCDSS v. Tabitha Hutto-Spires

CourtListener 10153158ScctappJul 24, 2024

Full text

THIS OPINION HAS NO PRECEDENTIAL VALUE. IT SHOULD NOT BE
CITED OR RELIED ON AS PRECEDENT IN ANY PROCEEDING
EXCEPT AS PROVIDED BY RULE 268(d)(2), SCACR.

THE STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA
In The Court of Appeals

South Carolina Department of Social Services,
Respondent,

v.

Tabitha Hutto-Spires and Cecil Spires, Defendants,

Of whom Tabitha Hutto-Spires is the Appellant.

In the interest of a minor under the age of eighteen.

Appellate Case No. 2024-000223

Appeal From Aiken County
Angela W. Abstance, Family Court Judge

Unpublished Opinion No. 2024-UP-280
Submitted July 19, 2024 – Filed July 24, 2024

AFFIRMED

Jennifer Lynn Mook, of Law Office of Jennifer Mook,
LLC, of Aiken, for Appellant.

Andrew Troy Potter, of Anderson, for Respondent.

Amy Patterson Shumpert, of Nance & McCants, of
Aiken, for the Guardian ad Litem.
PER CURIAM: Tabitha Hutto-Spires appeals the family court's final order
terminating her parental rights to her minor child. See S.C. Code Ann.
§ 63-7-2570 (Supp. 2023). Upon a thorough review of the record and the family
court's findings of fact and conclusions of law pursuant to Ex parte Cauthen, 291
S.C. 465, 354 S.E.2d 381 (1987), we find no meritorious issues warrant briefing.
Accordingly, we affirm the family court's ruling.

AFFIRMED. 1

THOMAS, MCDONALD, and VERDIN, JJ., concur.

1
We decide this case without oral argument pursuant to Rule 215, SCACR.

Continue your research in ChatGPT or Claude

Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.