CourtListener 10153119•In the Matter of the Care and Treatment of Tyrone Maurice Moore
In the Matter of the Care and Treatment of Tyrone Maurice Moore
CourtListener 10153119ScctappMay 1, 2024
Full text
THIS OPINION HAS NO PRECEDENTIAL VALUE. IT SHOULD NOT BE
CITED OR RELIED ON AS PRECEDENT IN ANY PROCEEDING
EXCEPT AS PROVIDED BY RULE 268(d)(2), SCACR.
THE STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA
In The Court of Appeals
In the Matter of the Care and Treatment of Tyrone
Maurice Moore, A/K/A Tyrone Moore, Appellant.
Appellate Case No. 2022-000547
Appeal From Berkeley County
R. Lawton McIntosh, Circuit Court Judge
Unpublished Opinion No. 2024-UP-155
Submitted April 1, 2024 – Filed May 1, 2024
APPEAL DISMISSED
Appellate Defender David Alexander, of Columbia, and
Tyrone Maurice Moore, pro se, both for Appellant.
Attorney General Alan McCrory Wilson and Senior
Assistant Deputy Attorney General Deborah R.J. Shupe,
both of Columbia, for Respondent.
PER CURIAM: Dismissed after consideration of Appellant's pro se brief and
review pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967). 1 Counsel's motion
to be relieved is granted.
APPEAL DISMISSED. 2
THOMAS, MCDONALD, and VERDIN, JJ., concur.
1
See In re McCoy, 360 S.C. 425, 602 S.E.2d 58 (2004) (adopting the Anders
procedure for alleged no-merit appeals in sexually violent predator involuntary
commitment appeals).
2
We decide this case without oral argument pursuant to Rule 215, SCACR.
Continue your research in ChatGPT or Claude
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.