State v. Quatase J. Jenrette

THIS OPINION HAS NO PRECEDENTIAL VALUE. IT SHOULD NOT BE
CITED OR RELIED ON AS PRECEDENT IN ANY PROCEEDING
EXCEPT AS PROVIDED BY RULE 268(d)(2), SCACR.

THE STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA
In The Court of Appeals

The State, Respondent,

v.

Quatase J. Jenrette, Appellant.

Appellate Case No. 2021-001108

Appeal From Horry County
Michael G. Nettles, Circuit Court Judge

Unpublished Opinion No. 2024-UP-166
Submitted April 1, 2024 – Filed May 8, 2024

APPEAL DISMISSED

Appellate Defender Jessica M. Saxon, of Columbia, and
Quatase J. Jenrette, pro se, both for Appellant.

Attorney General Alan McCrory Wilson and Senior
Assistant Attorney General Mark Reynolds Farthing,
both of Columbia, for Respondent.

PER CURIAM: Dismissed after consideration of Appellant's pro se brief and
review pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967). Counsel's motion to
be relieved is granted.
APPEAL DISMISSED. 1

GEATHERS, HEWITT, and VINSON, JJ., concur.

1
We decide this case without oral argument pursuant to Rule 215, SCACR.