SCDSS v. Daisy Brown

CourtListener 10153084ScctappMay 13, 2024

Full text

THIS OPINION HAS NO PRECEDENTIAL VALUE. IT SHOULD NOT BE
CITED OR RELIED ON AS PRECEDENT IN ANY PROCEEDING
EXCEPT AS PROVIDED BY RULE 268(d)(2), SCACR.

THE STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA
In The Court of Appeals

South Carolina Department of Social Services,
Respondent,

v.

Daisy Brown, Donovan K. Scott, and John Doe,
Defendants,

Of whom Daisy Brown is the Appellant

And

Donovan K. Scott is a Respondent.

In the interest of minors under the age of eighteen.

Appellate Case No. 2023-001565

Appeal From Richland County
Gwendlyne Y. Jones, Family Court Judge

Unpublished Opinion No. 2024-UP-173
Submitted May 8, 2024 – Filed May 13, 2024

AFFIRMED

Jennifer Lynn Mook, of Law Office of Jennifer Mook,
LLC, of Aiken, for Appellant.
Machelle Yvonne Thompson, of Thompson & Sete'fano,
LLC, of Columbia, as Guardian ad Litem for Appellant.

Carolyn Rose Sutherland, of South Carolina Department
of Social Services, of Columbia, for Respondent South
Carolina Department of Social Services.

Angela L. Kohel, of Richland County CASA, of
Columbia, for the Guardian ad Litem for the minor
children.

PER CURIAM: Daisy Brown appeals the family court's final order terminating
her parental rights to her minor children. See S.C. Code Ann. § 63-7-2570 (Supp.
2023). Upon a thorough review of the record and the family court's findings of
fact and conclusions of law pursuant to Ex parte Cauthen, 291 S.C. 465, 354
S.E.2d 381 (1987), we find no meritorious issues warrant briefing. Accordingly,
we affirm the family court's ruling.

AFFIRMED.1

GEATHERS, HEWITT, and VINSON, JJ., concur.

1
We decide this case without oral argument pursuant to Rule 215, SCACR.

Continue your research in ChatGPT or Claude

Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.