CourtListener 10152637•SCDSS v. Robinson
Full text
THIS OPINION HAS NO PRECEDENTIAL VALUE. IT SHOULD NOT BE
CITED OR RELIED ON AS PRECEDENT IN ANY PROCEEDING
EXCEPT AS PROVIDED BY RULE 268(d)(2), SCACR.
THE STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA
In The Court of Appeals
South Carolina Department of Social Services,
Respondent,
v.
Shaquille Robinson and Anthony Swinger, Defendants,
Of whom Shaquille Robinson is the Appellant.
In the interest of a minor under the age of eighteen.
Appellate Case No. 2022-001049
Appeal From Anderson County
Karen F. Ballenger, Family Court Judge
Unpublished Opinion No. 2023-UP-061
Submitted February 10, 2023 – Filed February 13, 2023
AFFIRMED
Robert Mills Ariail, Jr., of Law Office of R. Mills Ariail,
Jr., of Greenville; and Nima Fiuzat, of Clemson, both for
Appellant.
Gregory Lee Cole, Jr., of Cox & Cole, Attorneys at Law,
of Williamston, as Guardian ad Litem for Appellant.
Andrew Troy Potter, of Anderson, for Respondent.
John Marshall Swails, Jr., of Greenville, for the Guardian
ad Litem for the minor child.
PER CURIAM: Shaquille Robinson appeals the family court's final order
terminating her parental rights to her minor child. See S.C. Code Ann.
§ 63-7-2570 (Supp. 2022). Upon a thorough review of Robinson's pro se response,
the record, and the family court's findings of fact and conclusions of law pursuant
to Ex parte Cauthen, 291 S.C. 465, 354 S.E.2d 381 (1987), we find no meritorious
issues warrant briefing. Accordingly, we affirm the family court's ruling and
relieve Robinson's counsel.
AFFIRMED.1
THOMAS, MCDONALD, and HEWITT, JJ., concur.
1
We decide this case without argument pursuant to Rule 215, SCACR.
Continue your research in ChatGPT or Claude
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.