William B. Chisholm v. Guadalupe Juarez

THIS OPINION HAS NO PRECEDENTIAL VALUE. IT SHOULD NOT BE
CITED OR RELIED ON AS PRECEDENT IN ANY PROCEEDING
EXCEPT AS PROVIDED BY RULE 268(d)(2), SCACR.

THE STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA
In The Court of Appeals

William B. Chisholm, Appellant,

v.

Guadalupe Juarez, Respondent.

Appellate Case No. 2019-001750

Appeal From Greenville County
Edward W. Miller, Circuit Court Judge

Unpublished Opinion No. 2022-UP-098
Submitted February 1, 2022 – Filed March 9, 2022

AFFIRMED

William B. Chisholm, of Greenville, pro se.

Guadalupe Juarez, of Fountain Inn, pro se.

PER CURIAM: William B. Chisholm appeals an order from the circuit court
affirming the ruling of the magistrate court. On appeal, Chisholm argues (1) "Did
[the circuit court] err in thinking that the transcript of the case [it] was given would
be the same as that given to [Chisholm]" and (2) "Did [Chisholm] err in believing
that the record of transcript he was given was real?" Because Chisholm did not
provide arguments or supporting authority for his issues, these issues are deemed
abandoned. Accordingly, we affirm pursuant to Rule 220(b), SCACR, and the
following authority: First Sav. Bank v. McLean, 314 S.C. 361, 363, 444 S.E.2d
513, 514 (1994) (stating an argument is deemed abandoned on appeal when the
appellant fails to provide arguments or supporting authority).

AFFIRMED.1

THOMAS, MCDONALD, and HEWITT, JJ., concur.

1
We decide this case without oral argument pursuant to Rule 215, SCACR.