CourtListener 10152204•Karole Jensen v. Paul Andrew Furr
Full text
THIS OPINION HAS NO PRECEDENTIAL VALUE. IT SHOULD NOT BE
CITED OR RELIED ON AS PRECEDENT IN ANY PROCEEDING
EXCEPT AS PROVIDED BY RULE 268(d)(2), SCACR.
THE STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA
In The Court of Appeals
Karole Jensen and Fayrell Furr, Respondents,
v.
Paul Andrew Furr, Appellant.
In the interest of a minor under the age of eighteen.
Appellate Case No. 2020-001461
Appeal From Horry County
Jan B. Bromell Holmes, Family Court Judge
Unpublished Opinion No. 2022-UP-166
Submitted March 25, 2022 – Filed March 31, 2022
AFFIRMED
Kimberly Yancey Brooks, of Kimberly Y. Brooks,
Attorney at Law, of Greenville, for Appellant.
John O. McDougall, of McDougall, Self, Currence &
McLeod, LLP, of Columbia; and Deborah B. Dantzler, of
Conway, both for Respondents.
Melanie Carol Nicholson, of Law Office of Melanie C.
Nicholson, of North Myrtle Beach, as Guardian ad Litem.
PER CURIAM: Paul Andrew Furr appeals the family court's final order
terminating his parental rights to his minor child and granting the child's adoption.
See S.C. Code Ann. § 63-7-2570 (Supp. 2021). Upon a thorough review of the
record and the family court's findings of fact and conclusions of law pursuant to Ex
parte Cauthen, 291 S.C. 465, 354 S.E.2d 381 (1987), we find no meritorious issues
warrant briefing. Accordingly, we affirm the family court's ruling and relieve
Furr's counsel.
AFFIRMED.1
WILLIAMS, C.J., and KONDUROS and VINSON, JJ., concur.
1
We decide this case without argument pursuant to Rule 215, SCACR.
Continue your research in ChatGPT or Claude
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.