CourtListener 10152086•State v. Dorko
Full text
THIS OPINION HAS NO PRECEDENTIAL VALUE. IT SHOULD NOT BE
CITED OR RELIED ON AS PRECEDENT IN ANY PROCEEDING
EXCEPT AS PROVIDED BY RULE 268(d)(2), SCACR.
THE STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA
In The Court of Appeals
The State, Respondent,
v.
Mark Jeffrey Dorko, Appellant.
Appellate Case No. 2020-000239
Appeal From York County
Brian M. Gibbons, Circuit Court Judge
Unpublished Opinion No. 2021-UP-389
Submitted October 1, 2021 – Filed November 3, 2021
APPEAL DISMISSED
Appellate Defender Joanna Katherine Delany, of
Columbia, for Appellant.
Matthew C. Buchanan, of South Carolina Probation,
Parole and Pardon Services, of Columbia, for
Respondent.
PER CURIAM: Dismissed after review pursuant to Anders v. California, 386
U.S. 738 (1967). Counsel's motion to be relieved is granted.
APPEAL DISMISSED.1
KONDUROS, HILL, and HEWITT, JJ., concur.
1
We decide this case without oral argument pursuant to Rule 215, SCACR.
Continue your research in ChatGPT or Claude
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.