State v. Patterson

CourtListener 10152078ScctappNov 3, 2021

Full text

THIS OPINION HAS NO PRECEDENTIAL VALUE. IT SHOULD NOT BE
CITED OR RELIED ON AS PRECEDENT IN ANY PROCEEDING
EXCEPT AS PROVIDED BY RULE 268(d)(2), SCACR.

THE STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA
In The Court of Appeals

The State, Respondent,

v.

Yashawnus Patterson, Appellant.

Appellate Case No. 2020-000979

Appeal From Richland County
Jocelyn Newman, Circuit Court Judge

Unpublished Opinion No. 2021-UP-391
Submitted October 1, 2021 – Filed November 3, 2021

APPEAL DISMISSED

Chief Appellate Defender Robert Michael Dudek and
Appellate Defender Taylor Davis Gilliam, both of
Columbia, for Appellant.

Matthew C. Buchanan, of South Carolina Probation,
Parole and Pardon Services, of Columbia, for
Respondent.

PER CURIAM: Dismissed after review pursuant to Anders v. California, 386
U.S. 738 (1967). Counsel's motion to be relieved is granted.
APPEAL DISMISSED.1

KONDUROS, HILL, and HEWITT, JJ., concur.

1
We decide this case without oral argument pursuant to Rule 215, SCACR.

Continue your research in ChatGPT or Claude

Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.