Rudd v. State

THIS OPINION HAS NO PRECEDENTIAL VALUE. IT SHOULD NOT BE
CITED OR RELIED ON AS PRECEDENT IN ANY PROCEEDING
EXCEPT AS PROVIDED BY RULE 268(d)(2), SCACR.

THE STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA
In The Court of Appeals

Dwayne Lee Rudd, Petitioner,

v.

State of South Carolina, Respondent.

Appellate Case No. 2018-000091

ON WRIT OF CERTIORARI

Appeal From Aiken County
J. Mark Hayes, II, Circuit Court Judge

Opinion No. 2021-UP-366
Submitted October 1, 2021 – Filed October 27, 2021

DISMISSED AS IMPROVIDENTLY GRANTED

Appellate Defender Victor R Seeger, of Columbia, for
Petitioner.

Attorney General Alan McCrory Wilson, Senior
Assistant Deputy Attorney General Megan Harrigan
Jameson, and Assistant Attorney General Joshua
Abraham Edwards, all of Columbia, for Respondent.
PER CURIAM: We granted Dwayne Rudd's petition for a writ of certiorari to
review the post-conviction relief court's denial of relief based on the court's finding
that his ineffective assistance of counsel claim was without merit. We now dismiss
the writ as improvidently granted.

DISMISSED AS IMPROVIDENTLY GRANTED.1

KONDUROS, HILL, and HEWITT, JJ., concur.

1
We decide this case without oral argument pursuant to Rule 215, SCACR.