State v. Marett

CourtListener 10151988ScctappSep 22, 2021

Full text

THIS OPINION HAS NO PRECEDENTIAL VALUE. IT SHOULD NOT BE
CITED OR RELIED ON AS PRECEDENT IN ANY PROCEEDING
EXCEPT AS PROVIDED BY RULE 268(d)(2), SCACR.

THE STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA
In The Court of Appeals

The State, Respondent,

v.

Thomas Raynes Marett, Appellant.

Appellate Case No. 2019-001385

Appeal From Lexington County
Grace Gilchrist Knie, Circuit Court Judge

Unpublished Opinion No. 2021-UP-338
Submitted June 1, 2021 – Filed September 22, 2021

APPEAL DISMISSED

Appellate Defender Joanna Katherine Delany, of
Columbia, for Appellant.

Matthew C. Buchanan, of South Carolina Department of
Probation, Parole and Pardon Services, of Columbia, for
Respondent.

PER CURIAM: Dismissed after review pursuant to Anders v. California, 386
U.S. 738 (1967). Counsel's motion to be relieved is granted.
APPEAL DISMISSED.1

LOCKEMY, C.J., and HUFF and HEWITT, JJ., concur.

1
We decide this case without oral argument pursuant to Rule 215, SCACR.

Continue your research in ChatGPT or Claude

Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.