State v. Waldrup

THIS OPINION HAS NO PRECEDENTIAL VALUE. IT SHOULD NOT BE
CITED OR RELIED ON AS PRECEDENT IN ANY PROCEEDING
EXCEPT AS PROVIDED BY RULE 268(d)(2), SCACR.

THE STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA
In The Court of Appeals

The State, Respondent,

v.

Richard Douglas Waldrup, Appellant.

Appellate Case No. 2019-000438

Appeal From Cherokee County
J. Mark Hayes, II, Circuit Court Judge

Unpublished Opinion No. 2021-UP-200
Submitted May 1, 2021 – Filed June 9, 2021

APPEAL DISMISSED

Appellate Defender Sarah Elizabeth Shipe, of Columbia,
and Richard Douglas Waldrup, pro se, for Appellant.

Attorney General Alan McCrory Wilson and Senior
Assistant Deputy Attorney General William M. Blitch,
Jr., both of Columbia, for Respondent.

PER CURIAM: Dismissed after consideration of Appellant's pro se briefs and
review pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967). Counsel's motion to
be relieved is granted.
APPEAL DISMISSED.1

WILLIAMS, THOMAS, and HILL, JJ., concur.

1
We decide this case without oral argument pursuant to Rule 215, SCACR.