State v. Echols

THIS OPINION HAS NO PRECEDENTIAL VALUE. IT SHOULD NOT BE
CITED OR RELIED ON AS PRECEDENT IN ANY PROCEEDING
EXCEPT AS PROVIDED BY RULE 268(d)(2), SCACR.

THE STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA
In The Court of Appeals

The State, Respondent,

v.

Nikki Giovanni Echols, Appellant.

Appellate Case No. 2019-000561

Appeal From Florence County
Thomas A. Russo, Circuit Court Judge

Unpublished Opinion No. 2021-UP-130
Submitted April 1, 2021 – Filed April 28, 2021

APPEAL DISMISSED

Appellate Defender Victor R. Seeger, of Columbia, for
Appellant.

Matthew C. Buchanan, of South Carolina Department of
Probation, Parole and Pardon Services, of Columbia, for
Respondent.

PER CURIAM: Dismissed after review pursuant to Anders v. California, 386
U.S. 738 (1967). Counsel's motion to be relieved is granted.
APPEAL DISMISSED.1

KONDUROS, GEATHERS, and MCDONALD, JJ., concur.

1
We decide this case without oral argument pursuant to Rule 215, SCACR.