Jackson v. State of SC

THIS OPINION HAS NO PRECEDENTIAL VALUE. IT SHOULD NOT BE
CITED OR RELIED ON AS PRECEDENT IN ANY PROCEEDING
EXCEPT AS PROVIDED BY RULE 268(d)(2), SCACR.

THE STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA
In The Court of Appeals

Tre'Vaughn Jackson, Petitioner,

v.

State of South Carolina, Respondent.

Appellate Case No. 2017-001172

Appeal From Sumter County
Brian M. Gibbons, Circuit Court Judge

Unpublished Opinion No. 2021-UP-098
Submitted February 1, 2021 – Filed March 31, 2021

CERTIORARI DISMISSED AS IMPROVIDENTLY
GRANTED

Appellate Defender Lara Mary Caudy, of Columbia, for
Petitioner.

Assistant Attorney General Brianna Lynn Schill, of
Columbia, for Respondent.

PER CURIAM: After careful consideration of the Petition, Appendix, and briefs,
we dismiss the writ of certiorari as improvidently granted.

DISMISSED AS IMPROVIDENTLY GRANTED.
WILLIAMS, THOMAS, and HILL, JJ., concur.1

1
We decide this case without oral argument pursuant to Rule 215, SCACR.