SCDSS v. Burke

CourtListener 10151641ScctappNov 9, 2020

Full text

THIS OPINION HAS NO PRECEDENTIAL VALUE. IT SHOULD NOT BE
CITED OR RELIED ON AS PRECEDENT IN ANY PROCEEDING
EXCEPT AS PROVIDED BY RULE 268(d)(2), SCACR.

THE STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA
In The Court of Appeals

South Carolina Department of Social Services,
Respondent,

v.

Sarah Ann Burke, Jason Ulrich, and Micah Grant
Vincent, Defendants,

Of whom Sarah Ann Burke is the Appellant.

In the interest of minors under the age of eighteen.

Appellate Case No. 2020-000585

Appeal From Edgefield County
W. Greg Seigler, Family Court Judge

Unpublished Opinion No. 2020-UP-308
Submitted November 5, 2020 – Filed November 9, 2020

AFFIRMED

Kimberly Yancey Brooks, of Kimberly Y. Brooks,
Attorney at Law, of Greenville, for Appellant.

Lillia Ann Gray, of the South Carolina Department of
Social Services, of Lexington, for Respondent.
Clarke Wardlaw McCants, IV, of Nance & McCants, of
Aiken, for the Guardian ad Litem.

PER CURIAM: Sarah Ann Burke appeals the family court's final order
terminating her parental rights to her minor children. See S.C. Code Ann.
§ 63-7-2570 (Supp. 2019). Upon a thorough review of the record and the family
court's findings of fact and conclusions of law pursuant to Ex parte Cauthen, 291
S.C. 465, 354 S.E.2d 381 (1987), we find no meritorious issues warrant briefing.
Accordingly, we affirm the family court's ruling and relieve Burke's counsel.

AFFIRMED.1

THOMAS, HILL, and HEWITT, JJ., concur.

1
We decide this case without oral argument pursuant to Rule 215, SCACR.

Continue your research in ChatGPT or Claude

Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.