Pasnik v. Christmas

CourtListener 10151516ScctappAug 31, 2020

Full text

THIS OPINION HAS NO PRECEDENTIAL VALUE. IT SHOULD NOT BE
CITED OR RELIED ON AS PRECEDENT IN ANY PROCEEDING
EXCEPT AS PROVIDED BY RULE 268(d)(2), SCACR.

THE STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA
In The Court of Appeals

James Pasnik and Amanda Pasnik, Respondents,

v.

Amanda Edwards and Brandon Christmas, Defendants,

Of whom Brandon Christmas is the Appellant.

In the interest of a minor under the age of eighteen.

Appellate Case No. 2019-000946

Appeal From Horry County
Melissa J. Buckhannon, Family Court Judge

Unpublished Opinion No. 2020-UP-259
Submitted August 20, 2020 – Filed August 31, 2020

AFFIRMED

Kimberly Yancey Brooks, of Kimberly Y. Brooks,
Attorney at Law, of Greenville, for Appellants.

Carolyn R. Hills and Jennifer Darrow Hills, both of Hills
& Hills, PC, of Myrtle Beach; and Megan Catherine Hunt
Dell, of Dell Family Law, P.C., of Charleston, all for
Respondents.
Deborah B. Dantzler, of Conway, for the Guardian ad
Litem for the child.

Barbara Wilson Pratt, of Conway, for the Guardian ad
Litem for the appellant.

PER CURIAM: James Pasnik appeals from the family court's final orders
terminating his parental rights to his minor child and granting adoption to his
minor child's maternal grandparents. See S.C. Code Ann. § 63-7-2570 (Supp.
2019). Upon a thorough review of the record and the family court's findings of
fact and conclusions of law pursuant to Ex parte Cauthen, 291 S.C. 465, 354
S.E.2d 381 (1987), we find no meritorious issues warrant briefing. Accordingly,
we affirm the family court's ruling and relieve Father's counsel.

AFFIRMED.1

LOCKEMY, C.J., and KONDUROS and MCDONALD, JJ., concur.

1
We decide this case without oral argument pursuant to Rule 215, SCACR.

Continue your research in ChatGPT or Claude

Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.