State v. Ervin

THIS OPINION HAS NO PRECEDENTIAL VALUE. IT SHOULD NOT BE
CITED OR RELIED ON AS PRECEDENT IN ANY PROCEEDING
EXCEPT AS PROVIDED BY RULE 268(d)(2), SCACR.

THE STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA
In The Court of Appeals

The State, Respondent,

v.

Jarnelle Ladarius Ervin, Appellant.

Appellate Case No. 2018-000973

Appeal From York County
John C. Hayes, III, Circuit Court Judge

Unpublished Opinion No. 2020-UP-168
Submitted May 1, 2020 – Filed June 3, 2020

APPEAL DISMISSED

Appellate Defender Joanna Katherine Delany, of
Columbia, and Jarnelle Ladarius Ervin, pro se, for
Appellant.

Attorney General Alan McCrory Wilson and Senior
Assistant Deputy Attorney General William M. Blitch,
Jr., both of Columbia, for Respondent.
PER CURIAM: Dismissed after consideration of Appellant's pro se brief and
review pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967). Counsel's motion to
be relieved is granted.1

APPEAL DISMISSED.

WILLIAMS, KONDUROS, and HILL, JJ., concur.

1
We decide this case without oral argument pursuant to Rule 215, SCACR.