State v. Martin

CourtListener 10151426ScctappMay 6, 2020

Full text

THIS OPINION HAS NO PRECEDENTIAL VALUE. IT SHOULD NOT BE
CITED OR RELIED ON AS PRECEDENT IN ANY PROCEEDING
EXCEPT AS PROVIDED BY RULE 268(d)(2), SCACR.

THE STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA
In The Court of Appeals

The State, Respondent,

v.

Leslie Michael Martin, Appellant.

Appellate Case No. 2018-001663

Appeal From Florence County
Michael G. Nettles, Circuit Court Judge

Unpublished Opinion No. 2020-UP-127
Submitted March 1, 2020 – Filed May 6, 2020

APPEAL DISMISSED

Appellate Defender Victor R. Seeger, of Columbia, and
Leslie Michael Martin, pro se, for Appellant.

Attorney General Alan McCrory Wilson and Senior
Assistant Deputy Attorney General William M. Blitch,
Jr., both of Columbia, for Respondent.
PER CURIAM: Dismissed after consideration of Appellant's pro se brief and
review pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967). Counsel's motion to
be relieved is granted.1

APPEAL DISMISSED.

LOCKEMY, C.J., and GEATHERS and HEWITT, JJ., concur.

1
We decide this case without oral argument pursuant to Rule 215, SCACR.

Continue your research in ChatGPT or Claude

Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.