CourtListener 10151391•SCDSS v. Medlin
Full text
THIS OPINION HAS NO PRECEDENTIAL VALUE. IT SHOULD NOT BE
CITED OR RELIED ON AS PRECEDENT IN ANY PROCEEDING
EXCEPT AS PROVIDED BY RULE 268(d)(2), SCACR.
THE STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA
In The Court of Appeals
South Carolina Department of Social Services,
Respondent,
v.
Tiffany Medlin, Jason Collazo, Mario Mejia, and John
Doe, Defendants,
Of whom Tiffany Medlin is the Appellant,
and Jason Collazo, Mario Mejia, and John Doe are
Respondents.
In the interest of a minor under the age of eighteen.
Appellate Case No. 2019-002111
Appeal From Greenville County
Rochelle Y. Conits, Family Court Judge
Unpublished Opinion No. 2020-UP-165
Submitted May 28, 2020 – Filed May 29, 2020
AFFIRMED
Kimberly Yancey Brooks, of Kimberly Y. Brooks,
Attorney at Law, of Greenville, for Appellant.
Andrew Troy Potter, of Anderson, for Respondent South
Carolina Department of Social Services.
Neal Anthony Collins, of Carolina Law & Mediation,
LLC, of Easley, for Respondent Mario Mejia.
Michael Stephen Gambrell, of Michael S Gambrell, LLC,
of Greenville, for Respondent Jason Collazo.
Don J. Stevenson, of Don J. Stevenson, Attorney at Law,
of Greenville, for the Guardian ad Litem.
PER CURIAM: Tiffany Medlin appeals the family court's final order terminating
her parental rights to her minor child. See S.C. Code Ann. § 63-7-2570 (Supp.
2019). Upon a thorough review of the record and the family court's findings of
fact and conclusions of law pursuant to Ex parte Cauthen, 291 S.C. 465, 354
S.E.2d 381 (1987), we find no meritorious issues warrant briefing. Accordingly,
we affirm the family court's ruling and relieve Medlin's counsel.
AFFIRMED.1
LOCKEMY, C.J., and GEATHERS and HEWITT, JJ., concur.
1
We decide this case without oral argument pursuant to Rule 215, SCACR.
Continue your research in ChatGPT or Claude
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.