State v. Grant

THIS OPINION HAS NO PRECEDENTIAL VALUE. IT SHOULD NOT BE
CITED OR RELIED ON AS PRECEDENT IN ANY PROCEEDING
EXCEPT AS PROVIDED BY RULE 268(d)(2), SCACR.

THE STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA
In The Court of Appeals

The State, Respondent,

v.

Barrington Wayne Grant, Appellant.

Appellate Case No. 2018-000134

Appeal From Allendale County and Barnwell County
William P. Keesley, Circuit Court Judge

Unpublished Opinion No. 2020-UP-059
Submitted January 1, 2020 – Filed March 4, 2020

APPEAL DISMISSED

Appellate Defender Victor R. Seeger, of Columbia; and
Barrington Wayne Grant, pro se, for Appellant.

Matthew C. Buchanan, of South Carolina Probation,
Parole and Pardon Services, of Columbia, for
Respondent.
PER CURIAM: Dismissed after consideration of Appellant's pro se brief and
review pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967). Counsel's motion to
be relieved is granted.1

APPEAL DISMISSED.

HUFF, WILLIAMS, and MCDONALD, JJ., concur.

1
We decide this case without oral argument pursuant to Rule 215, SCACR.