SCDSS v. Venda Dill

THIS OPINION HAS NO PRECEDENTIAL VALUE. IT SHOULD NOT BE
CITED OR RELIED ON AS PRECEDENT IN ANY PROCEEDING
EXCEPT AS PROVIDED BY RULE 268(d)(2), SCACR.

THE STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA
In The Court of Appeals

South Carolina Department of Social Services,
Respondent,

v.

Venda Nicole Dill and Bradley McAbee, Defendants,

Of whom Venda Nicole Dill is the Appellant.

In the interest of a minor under the age of eighteen.

Appellate Case No. 2019-000756

Appeal From Spartanburg County
James F. Fraley, Jr., Family Court Judge

Unpublished Opinion No. 2019-UP-379
Submitted November 15, 2019 – Filed December 5, 2019

AFFIRMED

John Brandt Rucker and Allyson Sue Rucker, both of
The Rucker Law Firm, LLC, of Greenville, for
Appellant.

Deborah Murdock Gentry, of Murdock Law Firm, LLC,
of Mauldin; and Robert C. Rhoden, III, of the South
Carolina Department of Social Services, of Spartanburg,
both for Respondent.

Jacqueline Alicia Moss, of Law Firm of Jacqueline Moss,
for the Guardian ad Litem.

PER CURIAM: Venda Nicole Dill appeals the family court's final order
terminating her parental rights to her minor child. See S.C. Code Ann.
§ 63-7-2570 (Supp. 2019). Upon a thorough review of the record and the family
court's findings of fact and conclusions of law pursuant to Ex parte Cauthen, 291
S.C. 465, 354 S.E.2d 381 (1987), we find no meritorious issues warrant briefing.
Accordingly, we affirm the family court's ruling and relieve Dill's counsel.

AFFIRMED.1

SHORT, THOMAS, and GEATHERS, JJ., concur.

1
We decide this case without oral argument pursuant to Rule 215, SCACR.