State v. Mingo

THIS OPINION HAS NO PRECEDENTIAL VALUE. IT SHOULD NOT BE
CITED OR RELIED ON AS PRECEDENT IN ANY PROCEEDING
EXCEPT AS PROVIDED BY RULE 268(d)(2), SCACR.

THE STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA
In The Court of Appeals

The State, Respondent,

v.

Traevis A. Mingo, Appellant.

Appellate Case No. 2017-001679

Appeal From Lancaster County
Daniel Dewitt Hall, Circuit Court Judge

Unpublished Opinion No. 2019-UP-325
Submitted September 1, 2019 – Filed October 9, 2019

APPEAL DISMISSED

Chief Appellate Defender Robert Michael Dudek, of
Columbia, and Traevis A. Mingo, pro se, for Appellant.

General Counsel Matthew C. Buchanan, of South
Carolina Department of Probation, Parole and Pardon
Services, of Columbia, for Respondent.
PER CURIAM: Dismissed after consideration of Appellant's pro se brief and
review pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967). Counsel's motion to
be relieved is granted.1

APPEAL DISMISSED.

SHORT, THOMAS, and GEATHERS, JJ., concur.

1
We decide this case without oral argument pursuant to Rule 215, SCACR.