State v. Fleming

CourtListener 10151166ScctappOct 16, 2019

Full text

THIS OPINION HAS NO PRECEDENTIAL VALUE. IT SHOULD NOT BE
CITED OR RELIED ON AS PRECEDENT IN ANY PROCEEDING
EXCEPT AS PROVIDED BY RULE 268(d)(2), SCACR.

THE STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA
In The Court of Appeals

The State, Respondent,

v.

Tyrone Deangelo Fleming, Appellant.

Appellate Case No. 2018-000727

Appeal From Union County
Lee S. Alford, Circuit Court Judge

Unpublished Opinion No. 2019-UP-346
Submitted September 1, 2019 – Filed October 16, 2019

APPEAL DISMISSED

Appellate Defenders LaNelle Cantey DuRant and Adam
Sinclair Ruffin, of Columbia, for Appellant.

Attorney General Alan McCrory Wilson and Senior
Assistant Deputy Attorney General William M. Blitch,
Jr., both of Columbia, for Respondent.
PER CURIAM: Dismissed after review pursuant to Anders v. California, 386
U.S. 738 (1967). Counsel's motion to be relieved is granted.1

APPEAL DISMISSED.

HUFF, WILLIAMS, and MCDONALD, JJ., concur.

1
We decide this case without oral argument pursuant to Rule 215, SCACR.

Continue your research in ChatGPT or Claude

Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.