CourtListener 10151158•SCDSS v. Bernard Grogan
Full text
THIS OPINION HAS NO PRECEDENTIAL VALUE. IT SHOULD NOT BE
CITED OR RELIED ON AS PRECEDENT IN ANY PROCEEDING
EXCEPT AS PROVIDED BY RULE 268(d)(2), SCACR.
THE STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA
In The Court of Appeals
South Carolina Department of Social Services,
Respondent,
v.
Bernard Grogan and Ginger A. Grogan, Defendants,
Of whom Bernard Grogan is the Appellant.
In the interest of a minor under the age of eighteen.
Appellate Case No. 2019-000067
Appeal From Newberry County
Joseph C. Smithdeal, Family Court Judge
Unpublished Opinion No. 2019-UP-319
Submitted September 11, 2019 – Filed September 24, 2019
AFFIRMED
Scott Daniel Spivey, of Scott Spivey, Attorney at Law, of
Camden, for Appellant.
Sarah M. Ahmad, of the South Carolina Department of
Social Services, of Newberry, for Respondent.
James N. Parr, Jr., of James N Parr, Jr., Attorney at Law,
of Newberry, for the Guardian ad Litem.
PER CURIAM: Bernard Grogan appeals the family court's final order
terminating his parental rights to his minor child. See S.C. Code Ann. § 63-7-2570
(Supp. 2018). Upon a thorough review of the record and the family court's
findings of fact and conclusions of law pursuant to Ex parte Cauthen, 291 S.C.
465, 354 S.E.2d 381 (1987), we find no meritorious issues warrant briefing.
Accordingly, we affirm the family court's ruling and relieve Grogan's counsel.
AFFIRMED.1
HUFF, WILLIAMS, and MCDONALD, JJ., concur.
1
We decide this case without oral argument pursuant to Rule 215, SCACR.
Continue your research in ChatGPT or Claude
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.