State v. Cook

CourtListener 10151017ScctappMay 8, 2019

Full text

THIS OPINION HAS NO PRECEDENTIAL VALUE. IT SHOULD NOT BE
CITED OR RELIED ON AS PRECEDENT IN ANY PROCEEDING
EXCEPT AS PROVIDED BY RULE 268(d)(2), SCACR.

THE STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA
In The Court of Appeals

The State, Respondent,

v.

Nelson Sentelle Cook, Appellant.

Appellate Case No. 2018-000578

Appeal From York County
R. Keith Kelly, Circuit Court Judge

Unpublished Opinion No. 2019-UP-168
Submitted April 1, 2019 – Filed May 8, 2019

APPEAL DISMISSED

Appellate Defender Victor R. Seeger, of Columbia, for
Appellant.

General Counsel Matthew C. Buchanan, of the South
Carolina Department of Probation, Parole and Pardon
Services, of Columbia, for Respondent.
PER CURIAM: Dismissed after review pursuant to Anders v. California, 386
U.S. 738 (1967). Counsel's motion to be relieved is granted.1

APPEAL DISMISSED.

WILLIAMS, GEATHERS, and HILL, JJ., concur.

1
We decide this case without oral argument pursuant to Rule 215, SCACR.

Continue your research in ChatGPT or Claude

Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.