SCDSS v. Long

CourtListener 10151007ScctappMay 21, 2019

Full text

THIS OPINION HAS NO PRECEDENTIAL VALUE. IT SHOULD NOT BE
CITED OR RELIED ON AS PRECEDENT IN ANY PROCEEDING
EXCEPT AS PROVIDED BY RULE 268(d)(2), SCACR.

THE STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA
In The Court of Appeals

South Carolina Department of Social Services,
Respondent,

v.

Desiray Marie Bratton and Ty Clavon Long, Defendants,

Of whom Ty Clavon Long is the Appellant.

In the interest of a minor under the age of eighteen.

Appellate Case No. 2018-002000

Appeal From Horry County
A. E. Morehead, III, Family Court Judge

Unpublished Opinion No. 2019-UP-180
Submitted May 15, 2019 – Filed May 21, 2019

AFFIRMED

Melinda Inman Butler, of The Butler Law Firm, of
Union, for Appellant.

Charles Richard Rhodes, Jr., of Charles R. Rhodes Jr.,
PC, of Conway, for Respondent.
Ryan A. Stampfle, of Indigo Family Law, LLC, of
Surfside Beach, for the Guardian ad Litem.

PER CURIAM: Ty Clavon Long appeals the family court's final order
terminating his parental rights to his minor child. See S.C. Code Ann. § 63-7-2570
(Supp. 2018). Upon a thorough review of the record and the family court's
findings of fact and conclusions of law pursuant to Ex parte Cauthen, 291 S.C.
465, 354 S.E.2d 381 (1987), we find no meritorious issues warrant briefing.
Accordingly, we affirm the family court's ruling and relieve Long's counsel.

AFFIRMED.1

HUFF, THOMAS, and KONDUROS, JJ., concur.

1
We decide this case without oral argument pursuant to Rule 215, SCACR.

Continue your research in ChatGPT or Claude

Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.