CourtListener 10150954•State v. Duncan
Full text
THIS OPINION HAS NO PRECEDENTIAL VALUE. IT SHOULD NOT BE
CITED OR RELIED ON AS PRECEDENT IN ANY PROCEEDING
EXCEPT AS PROVIDED BY RULE 268(d)(2), SCACR.
THE STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA
In The Court of Appeals
The State, Respondent,
v.
Jimmy Edward Duncan, Appellant.
Appellate Case No. 2016-002126
Appeal From Greenville County
Perry H. Gravely, Circuit Court Judge
Unpublished Opinion No. 2019-UP-111
Submitted February 1, 2019 – Filed March 20, 2019
APPEAL DISMISSED
Appellate Defender Taylor Davis Gilliam, of Columbia,
and Jimmy Edward Duncan, pro se, for Appellant.
Attorney General Alan McCrory Wilson and Senior
Assistant Deputy Attorney General John Benjamin Aplin,
both of Columbia, for Respondent.
PER CURIAM: Dismissed after consideration of Appellant's pro se brief and
review pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967). Counsel's motion to
be relieved is granted. 1
APPEAL DISMISSED.
LOCKEMY, C.J., and SHORT and MCDONALD, JJ., concur
1
We decide this case without oral argument pursuant to Rule 215, SCACR.
Continue your research in ChatGPT or Claude
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.