State v. Geisendorff

THIS OPINION HAS NO PRECEDENTIAL VALUE. IT SHOULD NOT BE
CITED OR RELIED ON AS PRECEDENT IN ANY PROCEEDING
EXCEPT AS PROVIDED BY RULE 268(d)(2), SCACR.

THE STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA
In The Court of Appeals

The State, Respondent,

v.

Billy John Geisendorff, Appellant.

Appellate Case No. 2016-001901

Appeal From Lexington County
D. Garrison Hill, Circuit Court Judge

Unpublished Opinion No. 2019-UP-071
Submitted January 1, 2019 – Filed February 13, 2019

APPEAL DISMISSED

Deputy Chief Appellate Defender Wanda H. Carter, of
Columbia; and Billy John Geisendorff, pro se, both for
Appellant.

Attorney General Alan McCrory Wilson and Deputy
Attorney General Donald J. Zelenka, both of Columbia,
for Respondent.
PER CURIAM: Dismissed after consideration of Appellant's pro se brief and
review pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967). Counsel's motion to
be relieved is granted.1

APPEAL DISMISSED.

LOCKEMY, C.J., and THOMAS and GEATHERS, JJ., concur.

1
We decide this case without oral argument pursuant to Rule 215, SCACR.