CourtListener 10150802•State v. Smallwood
Full text
THIS OPINION HAS NO PRECEDENTIAL VALUE. IT SHOULD NOT BE
CITED OR RELIED ON AS PRECEDENT IN ANY PROCEEDING
EXCEPT AS PROVIDED BY RULE 268(d)(2), SCACR.
THE STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA
In The Court of Appeals
The State, Respondent,
v.
Willie Howard Smallwood, Appellant.
Appellate Case No. 2017-001987
Appeal From Greenville County
R. Scott Sprouse, Circuit Court Judge
Unpublished Opinion No. 2018-UP-472
Submitted November 1, 2018 – Filed December 19, 2018
APPEAL DISMISSED
Chief Appellate Defender Robert Michael Dudek, of
Columbia, for Appellant.
Matthew C. Buchanan, of the South Carolina Department
of Probation, Parole and Pardon Services, of Columbia,
for Respondent.
PER CURIAM: Dismissed after review pursuant to Anders v. California, 386
U.S. 738 (1967). Counsel's motion to be relieved is granted.1
APPEAL DISMISSED.
KONDUROS, MCDONALD, and HILL, JJ., concur.
1
We decide this case without oral argument pursuant to Rule 215, SCACR.
Continue your research in ChatGPT or Claude
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.