CourtListener 10150717•SCDSS v. Badger
Full text
THIS OPINION HAS NO PRECEDENTIAL VALUE. IT SHOULD NOT BE
CITED OR RELIED ON AS PRECEDENT IN ANY PROCEEDING
EXCEPT AS PROVIDED BY RULE 268(d)(2), SCACR.
THE STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA
In The Court of Appeals
South Carolina Department of Social Services,
Respondent,
v.
Carrie Badger and Jonathan Crane, Defendants,
Of whom Carrie Badger is the Appellant.
In the interest of minors under the age of eighteen.
Appellate Case No. 2017-002074
Appeal From Aiken County
Peter R. Nuessle, Family Court Judge
Unpublished Opinion No. 2018-UP-361
Submitted August 22, 2018 – Filed August 24, 2018
AFFIRMED
Montford Shuler Caughman, of Caughman Law, LLC, of
Lexington, for Appellant.
Susanna M. Ringler, of the South Carolina Department of
Social Services, of Aiken, for Respondent.
Amy Patterson Shumpert, of Nance, McCants & Massey,
of Aiken, for the Guardian ad Litem.
PER CURIAM: Carrie Badger appeals the family court's final order terminating
her parental rights to her minor child. See S.C. Code Ann. § 63-7-2570 (Supp.
2017). Upon a thorough review of the record and the family court's findings of
fact and conclusions of law pursuant to Ex parte Cauthen, 291 S.C. 465, 354
S.E.2d 381 (1987), we find no meritorious issues warrant briefing. Accordingly,
we affirm the family court's ruling and relieve Badger's counsel.
AFFIRMED.1
KONDUROS, MCDONALD, and HILL, JJ., concur.
1
We decide this case without oral argument pursuant to Rule 215, SCACR.
Continue your research in ChatGPT or Claude
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.